
IDENTIFYING THE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN MODELS
The Toyota Landcruiser Prado was first released in 1996.
This model was the 95 series. They were only released with
a petrol engine, either the common 3.4 litre V6 known as the
VZJ95 or the 2.7 litre 4 cylinder known as the RZJ95.
In 2000 the KZJ95 Prado was released. It was basically
the same but with the 1KZ-T 4 cylinder diesel engine. It
was available in both auto and manual version.
The Prado was released in 4 different versions. The
base model was the RV which never had flares over the wheel
arches and had the skinny 16x6 steel wheel rims fitted.
The GXL was the next level up and had the flares and a wider
16x7 inch steel or alloy wheel. The top two luxury models
were the TX and then the Grande. The Grande having leather
interior etc.

In 2003 the 120 series Prado was released. With this
model came the release of the 4.0 litre VVTI V6 petrol engine
and the 1KZ-TE electronic 4 cylinder diesel engine. The
diesel engine produces 96Kw in standard format and the V6 179Kw.
Both variants were offered with a 5 speed manual or 4 speed
automatic transmission. In 2005 the Prado had a 6 speed
manual and 5 speed automatic transmission upgrade for the petrol
models. The diesel retained the 5 speed manual and 4 speed
auto transmissions. In November 2006 the diesel was
upgraded to the DOHC 3.0 turbo inter-cooled engine producing
127KW of power and 410Nm of torque. Also a dramatic
improvement in fuel economy down to a claimed 9.6 litres per
100km.
PROBLEMS
To this date the Prado has proven to be a very reliable
vehicle in both petrol and diesel models. The only drama
we have come across is the harmonic balancer retaining bolt on
the 3.4 litre V6 engine can come loose. When this happens
the front crankshaft gear moves on the locating key-way causing
wear. If left too long the crankshaft groove wears and
this means expensive repairs. The crankshaft has to be
either replaced or removed and repaired.
While on the V6 engine, when we have replaced clutches we
have found the only problems being the locking nuts on the
exhaust system. The clutch is usually a repair well into
the life of any vehicle so with many kilometres under the
vehicles belt the corrosion combined with the locking nuts have
been challenging to say the least to remove. Once these
are out with no breakages, the rest of the clutch job is no
problem.
It is crucial for the timing belts to be replaced on both the
diesel and the 3.4 litre engines. The 4.0 litre engine has
returned to the use of a timing chain so no servicing of this
item is required. If the timing belts are not changed at
the required interval, major engine damage will result if the
belt fails, and it will. The diesel requires its belt to
be replaced at 150 000km and the 3.4 V6 is 100 000 km.
There was a recall on the VZJ95 model for a
rear axle inspection and replacement if necessary. The 120
series has had a recall in 2005 for a crank shaft pulley
inspection on the V6 and in 2006 for a brake master cylinder
removal and inspection on all models.
The CD stacker gives problems if not used
regularly and is usually replaced under warranty. If you
are intending on tinting your windows check with your supplier
first as some tints interfere with the radio reception because
the aerial is in the rear side windows.
Dust intrusion on mine and others I have
spoken to has been dreadful. First thing fit a cabin
filter, located behind the glove box. I use an after
market brand, Jayair as I think it is of better quality than the
toyota one. I still have bad dust inside to the point
where I think it is unacceptable but we have grown used to it.
Rear diffs will break especially in the 4.0
litre V6 and if you lift a wheel whilst 4 wheel driving.
When that wheel comes back down the torque from that wheel
travels back through the driveline and it is usually the teeth
on the rear crown wheel which will strip off. Be careful.
Body cracks inside the front guards just in
front of the fire wall and the inner mudguards. No defined underlying cause but
theories such as standard suspension too soft and when it
bottoms out to the bump stops, the shock wave stops in the front
guards in front of the fire wall. OME suspension is too
stiff and consequently the same thing happens. Bilstein
shocks seem good on both compression and rebound. Not to
stiff but not as soft as OEM suspension. The cracks appear
inside the guards just in front of the second body mount.
A good spot to inspect first if you are looking at buying.
If there is cracks walk away as they are expensive to have
repaired properly. If a second battery has been fitted and
the vehicle has done off road work, chances are the mounting
points are or have been cracked. I have just welded mine
up after 18 months and 43 000 km. Pathetic I know but
these are just built to softly.
Fuel economy on the diesel is not what I
expected and as bad as 15 litres per 100 combined. I have
found to be very light on the right foot, have no roof rack and
keep the speed under 100 km/h and you can get down in the 12's.
Frustrating but its a fact. The best I have got is 12.6
litres per 100 from Sydney to Fraser Island with a roof rack and
roof bag. I kept it under 100km/h all the way.
Around town now with no roof rack and standard tyres I am
averaging 13.4 litres per 100. Not the best but it is what
it is.
ARB BULL BAR OWNERS
- If you have an ARB bull bar fitted I suggest you do some
research with your supplier. Some are helpful and others
are not so. The early bull bars were fitted with 10mm
shorter crush tubes inside the front body mount to so called
reduce the wobble. This has now been revised and the
standard length crush tubes are now fitted. It was assumed
the inside front guards crack due to these but this is not
proven. Mine was fitted with the shorter crush tubes and
instead of pulling everything down tight the nut ran out of
thread and the front body mounts were loose causing an annoying
rattle. When I went to remove them moisture had got in and
they had seized up. It took me 5 hours to remove them with
perseverance and cutting with a grinder. I fitted new body
mount bolts and I also fitted a large flat shock washer above
the upper body mount to give the mounting a bit more to bite
down on. Bull bar wobble is dramatically reduced and the
annoying rattle is gone. To check which crush tubes you
have fitted, get under the vehicle in front of the front wheel.
Look up to the front of the chassis where the front body mount
is. If the lower rubber mount is crushed up and alot
shorter than the upper mount you have the shorter crush tubes.
Go and see ARB. If both upper and lower mounts look about
the same length and the upper ridges of the lower mount aren't
crushed up, you are OK.
DASH PROBLEMS
The 95 series Prado has dash mounting problems, although we
haven't experienced one yet. We have heard of reports
where the dash has actually fallen off over rough roads.
Toyota dealers have been known to be constantly tightening dash
mountings up to rectify the squeaks and rattles.
My 120 Prado had a constant dash squeak, like
two rubber components rubbing together, over the corrugated
roads. It wasn't very loud but definitely noticeable.
Since returning home I haven't noticed it coming back.
WARRANTY
The Prado is not known to have too many problems requiring
warranty repairs. The leather steering wheels have been
known to be replaced due to wear. The standard warranty on these vehicles is 3 years/100 000 km
however they do opt for an extended warranty up to 5 years/150
000 km. You do have to pay for the extended warranty and
it has to be renewed before the standard warranty expires, and
is a good option.
ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
The 1KZ-TE engine has plenty of low down torque but tends to
run out of puff in free way conditions. It is quite
thirsty compared to what I expected it to be. There are a few
after market devices which are a piggy back system which remaps
the fuel delivery giving a wider torque range. I have
driven a Nissan Patrol with and without one and they do make a
significant difference. Devices such as Safari D-Tronic
and Tune-It systems are readily available fitted for around the
$1500.00 mark. Even though they make the vehicle pull
better, I would think there would be a warranty issue if
something was to go wrong. Whether to fit one or not is up
to the individual. For the record I don't have one fitted
to mine and what the future holds I can't say as yet.
RECALLS
The early 120 series petrol engine model was recalled for an
inspection of the front crankshaft retaining bolt. From
memory the inspection was for an oil leak at the seal and a
locking set up of the front retaining bolt. Most should
have been done by now.
BODY PROBLEMS
The early 120 series have had a drama
with the spare wheel cover, mounted on the rear door, rubbing on
the door body panel causing bare metal to show and potentially
resulting in rust forming. Some Toyota dealers have been
rectifying this with a sponge product by sticking it to the body
panel. I had the spare wheel off my 120 which is a June
2005 model and the sponge is already fitted. I would say
Toyota have recognised the problem and rectified it. It
would pay to take your spare wheel off and then remove the
plastic tray on the bottom by removing the three 10mm head
retaining bolts and giving your rear panels a good inspection.
Fitting of the factory alloy bull bar
has caused a problem with water ingress into the air intake.
When the factory bull bar is fitted the inner splash guard has
to be modified and reports of this constantly coming loose is
common. The fitting of an air snorkel will alleviate the
water ingress problem but this is not an option for some.
SUSPENSION MODIFICATIONS
Both models run a live rear axle with coil springs.
Upper and lower locating arms.
Front suspension consists of independent coil spring with
upper and lower control arms. The front shocks are a
Macpherson Strut set up or commonly known as a coil over shock
set up. The 120 series has an estimated 25mm longer
suspension travel than the earlier 95 series.
The Prado benefits with a suspension lift especially if you
are going to do some off road work. Both models have
several manufacturers of after market suspension kits available.
If you are looking for some better off road ability on a
standard vehicle go for a set of medium strength lifted springs
front and rear. This will give you approximately 40mm lift
in the front and 50mm lift in the rear. If you have items
such as steel bull bars and winches I suggest you go for a heavy
duty front spring. If you carry the regular off road gear
in the rear I would go for an air bag helper inside the rear
springs. These are available from both Poly Air and
Firestone Coil Rites.
The Standard Toyota shocks are quite a good product and I
have left them in mine for the time being. Reports of the
Lovell springs and Bilstein shock set ups are working really
well but they are expensive. For an example my own 120
series, pictured above, had medium Lovell springs fitted front
and rear. I ended up with 40mm lift in the front and 50mm
in the rear. Once I fitted the ARB steel winch bar, winch
and dual batteries I was down to only a 10mm lift. I have
since fitted heavy duty front springs and I am back to my 40mm
lift. The rear seems to carry the weight quite well as I
am still at 50mm lift and I have fitted rear drawers, fridge,
water tank 45litre and camping gear. I have the Firestone
Coil Rites ordered just in case as in my opinion the heavy duty
rear springs will make the ride too firm.
I can now report on the suspension after my Simpson Desert
Trip. The standard Toyota shocks performed well but are a
little soft for the extra weight of touring. They do
bounce a little but I never experienced fade or failure during
4500km of dirt road. The Lovell springs carried the weight
with no problems and the air bags weren't required although they
did help with body roll and sway whilst crossing sand dunes.
I will be fitting
Bilsteins some time in the near future.
I have now fitted Bilstein
shocks to the front as the front Lovell springs settled after my
8500km desert trip. The Bilstein shocks have three height
settings for the spring mounting plate for fine height
adjustment. I have set mine in the middle still with the
heavy duty springs. I like the way it now sits, level
front to back. The Bilsteins have given me a slightly
firmer ride than the Toyota shocks and I am very happy with it.
TYRE/RIM COMBINATIONS
The 120 series GXL model and up were
fitted with a 17x7.5 inch alloy rims with 265/65x17 tyres.
You can also use ROH Trak II rims. I think the 65 series tyre gives the Prado a very firm ride on
average bitumen roads. I have experimented in lowering
front tyre pressures to improve the ride but this increased tyre
wear on the edges. The GX base model 120 has 17x6 steel
rims fitted with 225/70x17 tyres.
Although not recommended you can get
the earlier 95 series 16 inch wheel onto the later 120 series
Prado. I have fitted 16x7 inch steel rims to the rear with
no problems. I had to file down the casting marks on the
front callipers to fit these wheels onto the front. I have
put 265/75x16 Goodyear Wrangler MTR tyres on these rims. I
do notice that on full lock the tyre just rubs the mudflaps on
the front slightly. I expect this to not cause any
problems. I wouldn't go any bigger as the 265/75x16's are
readily available and quite reasonably priced compared to the 17
inch tyres. The ride has improved but the speedo is out
slightly. The speedo reads slower than what you are going
so always compensate for this.
LINKS
Further links can be found at
http://www.lcool.org/technical/120_series/120_series_technical.html
or
http://www.lcool.org/technical/technical.html
CONCLUSION
The 120 series Prado is an extremely comfortable and quiet
vehicle to drive. With a few suspension upgrades it
becomes a very capable off road or touring vehicle. With
180 litres of fuel capacity and the economy of the diesel engine
over the petrol, it is quite an attractive option as the price difference between
the petrol and diesel is minimal. The diesel is a little
thirsty over extended periods. 16.1 litres per 100km over
an 8000km Simpson Desert trip. The 4.0 VVTI V6 is a
modern up-to-date vehicle which produces plenty of power.
The diesel engine is getting a little long in the tooth and is
under powered compared to its competitors but is tried, tested
and proven. With the size of the fuel tanks the way they
are, the spare wheel has to be carried on the rear door and as a
touring vehicle this leaves no room for a second spare.
Speaking from experience going down from an 80 series Landcruiser to the Prado, I have found you have to pack a little
more wisely but the second spare is impossible for me to carry.
The roof carrying capacity is down to 100 kg compared to the
Landcruiser's 150 kg. Apart from this, it is a bit lightly
built and does suffer from body cracks but is highly
recommended and a capable 4wd which is competitively priced.
Wives have often stated that it is an easy car to drive around
town and to park in the local shopping centre. Rear
visibility is not the best because of the rear mounted spare but
excellent large side mirrors makes rear vision acceptable.
Last updated
22/04/2007 21:53.
Web Design & Creation by
Scott Lonard
-Owner.
Copyright © 2003, All rights
reserved.
Note:- All comments are our opinions only and have been
a result of our experience through our workshop repairs, testing and our
customers comments and failures.
|